PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAMTX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAMTX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAMTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAMTX achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AAMTX has outperformed FRQAX with an annualized return of 12.01%, while FRQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.70% annualized return.


AAMTX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.84%
YTD
10.80%
6M
11.49%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
12.01%

FRQAX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.52%
YTD
3.95%
6M
4.14%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAMTX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAMTX
American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund
10.80%20.37%15.16%21.03%-19.75%16.94%19.06%24.60%-5.95%22.20%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.95%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.06%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AAMTX and FRQAX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010

0.87

The correlation between AAMTX and FRQAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (3 years) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAMTX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAMTX
AAMTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AAMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AAMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAMTX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAMTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAMTXFRQAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.46

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

3.61

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.95

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.35

12.54

-0.19

AAMTX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAMTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAMTX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAMTXFRQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.46

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.48

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.88

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.51

+0.26

Drawdowns

AAMTX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAMTX drawdown since its inception was -29.32%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMTX and FRQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAMTXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.32%

-38.22%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-3.46%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-5.27%

-10.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-17.24%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.32%

-17.24%

-12.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-4.57%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

0.81%

+1.33%

Volatility

AAMTX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAMTX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.67%. This indicates that AAMTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAMTXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

1.67%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

3.43%

+6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

4.15%

+7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

5.56%

+9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

5.33%

+9.70%

AAMTX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAMTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAMTX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

AAMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than FRQAX's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAMTX
American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund
5.14%5.70%3.22%2.22%6.92%4.15%2.98%3.92%4.46%2.18%3.19%4.06%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.82%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAMTX and FRQAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAMTX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FRQAX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMTX dropped -29.32% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAMTX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer