PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAMI vs. SEIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAMI vs. SEIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) and SEI Investments Company (SEIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAMI achieves a 67.66% return, which is significantly higher than SEIC's 9.64% return.


AAMI

1D
1.21%
1M
11.99%
YTD
67.66%
6M
65.23%
1Y
148.44%
3Y*
52.17%
5Y*
28.42%
10Y*

SEIC

1D
1.42%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.01%
1Y
7.48%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAMI vs. SEIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
67.66%78.64%37.70%-6.72%-19.45%33.00%93.85%-0.80%-30.71%
SEIC
SEI Investments Company
9.64%0.63%31.47%10.59%-2.94%7.38%-11.10%43.35%-35.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AAMI and SEIC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.50

The correlation between AAMI and SEIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAMI:

$2.81B

SEIC:

$11.13B

EPS

AAMI:

$2.35

SEIC:

$5.85

PE Ratio

AAMI:

33.42

SEIC:

15.27

PS Ratio

AAMI:

4.39

SEIC:

4.76

PB Ratio

AAMI:

36.28

SEIC:

4.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAMI:

$641.50M

SEIC:

$2.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAMI:

$652.90M

SEIC:

$925.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

AAMI:

$185.00M

SEIC:

$928.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAMI vs. SEIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAMI
AAMI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AAMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AAMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIC
SEIC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SEIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAMI vs. SEIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) and SEI Investments Company (SEIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAMISEICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.08

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.21

0.39

+7.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.26

0.75

+21.51

AAMI vs. SEIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is higher than the SEIC Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAMI and SEIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAMI vs. SEIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAMI drawdown since its inception was -75.23%, which is greater than SEIC's maximum drawdown of -71.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMI and SEIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAMISEICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.23%

-71.17%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.20%

-19.36%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.52%

-23.25%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.45%

-26.00%

-25.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.54%

+3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.62%

-21.17%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.70%

10.04%

-3.34%

Volatility

AAMI vs. SEIC - Volatility Comparison

Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to SEI Investments Company (SEIC) at 5.42%. This indicates that AAMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAMISEICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.53%

5.42%

+6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.79%

18.58%

+8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.95%

22.41%

+17.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.69%

22.40%

+12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.10%

25.79%

+16.31%

Dividends

AAMI vs. SEIC - Dividend Comparison

AAMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than SEIC's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
0.29%0.09%0.15%0.21%0.19%0.16%1.19%3.91%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEIC
SEI Investments Company
1.16%1.23%1.15%1.40%1.42%1.26%1.25%1.04%1.36%0.81%1.09%0.95%

Financials

AAMI vs. SEIC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acadian Asset Management Inc and SEI Investments Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
167.10M
622.18M
(AAMI) Total Revenue
(SEIC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AAMI vs. SEIC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acadian Asset Management Inc and SEI Investments Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.3%
0
Portfolio components
AAMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a gross profit of 159.30M and revenue of 167.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.

SEIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SEI Investments Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 622.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AAMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported an operating income of 42.00M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.

SEIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SEI Investments Company reported an operating income of 189.49M and revenue of 622.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.

AAMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a net income of 24.30M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.

SEIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SEI Investments Company reported a net income of 174.49M and revenue of 622.18M, resulting in a net margin of 28.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAMI and SEIC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAMI has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to SEIC (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMI dropped -75.23% vs SEIC's -71.17%.

AAMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAMI and SEIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer