AAMBX vs. AALGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) and Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX).
AAMBX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Dec 2, 1976. AALGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 15, 1987.
Performance
AAMBX vs. AALGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAMBX vs. AALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund | -0.53% | 3.39% | 2.70% | 6.18% | -10.93% | 1.99% | 4.78% | 7.38% | 0.32% | 4.47% |
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund | -1.71% | 20.49% | 27.79% | 21.71% | -19.38% | 20.37% | 14.46% | 22.71% | -8.75% | 10.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAMBX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly higher than AALGX's -1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, AAMBX has underperformed AALGX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while AALGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.
AAMBX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
AALGX
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAMBX vs. AALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAMBX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AALGX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAMBX vs. AALGX — Risk / Return Rank
AAMBX
AALGX
AAMBX vs. AALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) and Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAMBX | AALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 1.15 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.70 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.67 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | 7.86 | -6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAMBX | AALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 1.15 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.59 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAMBX and AALGX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
AAMBX vs. AALGX - Dividend Comparison
AAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than AALGX's 11.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund | 3.54% | 4.65% | 3.93% | 2.58% | 2.97% | 2.66% | 2.80% | 3.35% | 3.45% | 3.40% | 3.41% | 3.39% |
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund | 11.24% | 11.05% | 23.12% | 5.51% | 3.21% | 14.40% | 3.01% | 12.68% | 9.82% | 1.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AAMBX vs. AALGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAMBX drawdown since its inception was -49.18%, smaller than the maximum AALGX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMBX and AALGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAMBX | AALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.18% | -55.28% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.89% | -11.83% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.17% | -34.65% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.17% | -35.32% | +19.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -6.52% | +4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -10.56% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.51% | -0.31% |
Volatility
AAMBX vs. AALGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) is 1.42%, while Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that AAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAMBX | AALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 6.02% | -4.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.02% | 9.70% | -7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.12% | 17.07% | -10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 18.67% | -13.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 18.31% | -13.91% |