AAMBX vs. AAHYX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AAMBX (Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund) and AAHYX (Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund) are both mutual funds - AAMBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Thrivent, while AAHYX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, AAMBX returned 1.79%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for AAHYX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAMBX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for AAHYX.

Performance

AAMBX vs. AAHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) and Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAMBX achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than AAHYX's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AAMBX has underperformed AAHYX with an annualized return of 1.79%, while AAHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.95% annualized return.

AAMBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 7.56%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: 0.56%
• 10Y*: 1.79%

AAHYX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 6M: 3.87%
• 1Y: 10.90%
• 3Y*: 8.47%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 4.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAMBX vs. AAHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund	1.88%	3.39%	2.70%	6.18%	-10.93%	1.99%	4.78%	7.38%	0.32%	4.47%
AAHYX Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund	3.55%	9.57%	6.80%	9.27%	-12.64%	6.22%	6.67%	13.12%	-3.08%	8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AAMBX and AAHYX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 1997	0.08

Over the past year, AAMBX and AAHYX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

AAMBX vs. AAHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAMBX

AAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 62
AAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
AAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

AAHYX

AAHYX Risk / Return Rank: 79
AAHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AAHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AAHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AAHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
AAHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAMBX vs. AAHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) and Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAMBX	AAHYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.69	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	3.92	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.54	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	3.23	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.76	14.35	-5.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAMBX vs. AAHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the AAHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAMBX and AAHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAMBX	AAHYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.69	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.59	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.82	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.71	-0.26

Drawdowns

AAMBX vs. AAHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAMBX drawdown since its inception was -49.18%, which is greater than AAHYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMBX and AAHYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAMBX	AAHYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.18%	-34.18%	-15.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.13%	-3.54%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.56%	-6.23%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.17%	-16.52%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.17%	-20.04%	+3.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.26%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-4.55%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	0.79%	+0.11%

Volatility

AAMBX vs. AAHYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) is 1.30%, while Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that AAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAMBX	AAHYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	1.52%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.53%	3.40%	-0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42%	4.25%	-0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.77%	5.78%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.43%	6.02%	-1.59%

AAMBX vs. AAHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAMBX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AAHYX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAMBX vs. AAHYX - Dividend Comparison

AAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than AAHYX's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAHYX Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund	3.67%	3.73%	3.83%	3.55%	3.10%	6.31%	2.44%	3.54%	5.72%	2.85%	3.39%	3.31%
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund	3.51%	4.65%	3.93%	2.58%	2.97%	2.66%	2.80%	3.35%	3.45%	3.40%	3.41%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAMBX and AAHYX in my portfolio?

AAMBX and AAHYX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAMBX or AAHYX?

AAHYX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to AAMBX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMBX dropped -49.18% vs AAHYX's -34.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.