AALGX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
AALGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 15, 1987. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
AALGX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AALGX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund | -4.42% | 20.49% | 27.79% | 21.71% | -19.38% | 20.37% | 14.46% | 22.71% | -8.75% | 10.85% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AALGX achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, AALGX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.92%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
AALGX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AALGX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AALGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AALGX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
AALGX
CSUAX
AALGX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AALGX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.63 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 2.17 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 2.36 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 10.32 | -4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AALGX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.63 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.50 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between AALGX and CSUAX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AALGX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
AALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.56%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund | 11.56% | 11.05% | 23.12% | 5.51% | 3.21% | 14.40% | 3.01% | 12.68% | 9.82% | 1.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
AALGX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AALGX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALGX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AALGX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -52.20% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -7.98% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.65% | -20.45% | -14.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | -35.05% | -0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -4.38% | -4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.56% | -8.49% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 1.83% | +0.65% |
Volatility
AALGX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that AALGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AALGX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 3.26% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 6.89% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 11.48% | +5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 12.89% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 14.89% | +3.40% |