AAIZX vs. ALBAX
AAIZX (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z) and ALBAX (Alger Growth & Income Fund) are both mutual funds - AAIZX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Alger, while ALBAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Alger. Over the past year, AAIZX returned 61.88% vs 34.45% for ALBAX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAIZX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for ALBAX.
Performance
AAIZX vs. ALBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAIZX achieves a 26.36% return, which is significantly higher than ALBAX's 13.35% return.
AAIZX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 26.36%
- 6M
- 25.19%
- 1Y
- 61.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALBAX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- 34.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.55%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
AAIZX vs. ALBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAIZX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z | 26.36% | 41.00% | 33.76% |
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund | 13.35% | 19.89% | 13.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAIZX and ALBAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AAIZX and ALBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAIZX vs. ALBAX — Risk / Return Rank
AAIZX
ALBAX
AAIZX vs. ALBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAIZX | ALBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.52 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.43 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | 20.11 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAIZX | ALBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 2.89 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.84 | 0.67 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
AAIZX vs. ALBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAIZX drawdown since its inception was -29.00%, smaller than the maximum ALBAX drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAIZX and ALBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAIZX | ALBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | -40.56% | +11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -7.86% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.44% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -7.34% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 1.73% | +4.00% |
Volatility
AAIZX vs. ALBAX - Volatility Comparison
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z (AAIZX) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) at 3.01%. This indicates that AAIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAIZX | ALBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 3.01% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.82% | 9.17% | +7.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.35% | 12.06% | +10.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.44% | 15.51% | +11.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.44% | 17.25% | +10.19% |
AAIZX vs. ALBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAIZX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ALBAX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAIZX vs. ALBAX - Dividend Comparison
AAIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than ALBAX's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAIZX Alger AI Enablers & Adopters Z | 5.00% | 6.31% | 4.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.08% | 0.98% | 1.24% | 4.17% | 2.55% | 5.00% | 6.75% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAIZX and ALBAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAIZX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to ALBAX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAIZX dropped -29.00% vs ALBAX's -40.56%.
ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAIZX and ALBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer