AAINX vs. BRW
AAINX (Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund) and BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, AAINX returned 2.32%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for BRW. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAINX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for BRW.
Performance
AAINX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAINX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 3.83% return.
AAINX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.05%
BRW
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
AAINX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAINX Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund | 1.81% | 7.82% | 4.90% | 7.77% | -10.57% | 1.36% |
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 3.83% | 5.89% | 12.16% | 18.49% | -4.64% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAINX and BRW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAINX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank
AAINX
BRW
AAINX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund (AAINX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAINX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.70 | 0.31 | +2.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.28 | 0.48 | +3.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.07 | +0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 0.23 | +2.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | 0.42 | +13.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAINX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 0.31 | +2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.59 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
AAINX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAINX drawdown since its inception was -15.72%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAINX and BRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAINX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -17.74% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -17.74% | +15.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.86% | -17.74% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.18% | -17.74% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.51% | +8.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -3.93% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 9.86% | -9.31% |
Volatility
AAINX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund (AAINX) is 1.07%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that AAINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAINX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 2.28% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 7.54% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77% | 13.20% | -10.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.01% | 12.86% | -8.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.89% | 12.86% | -8.97% |
AAINX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAINX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAINX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison
AAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than BRW's 14.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAINX Thrivent Opportunity Income Plus Fund | 4.62% | 4.62% | 4.78% | 3.88% | 4.00% | 2.74% | 2.99% | 3.76% | 4.04% | 3.28% | 3.55% | 3.88% |
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 14.89% | 14.46% | 12.27% | 16.02% | 13.82% | 4.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAINX and BRW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRW has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to AAINX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAINX dropped -15.72% vs BRW's -17.74%.
AAINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAINX and BRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer