AAHYX vs. AAMBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AAHYX (Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund) and AAMBX (Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - AAHYX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Thrivent, while AAMBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, AAHYX returned 4.95%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for AAMBX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAHYX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for AAMBX.

Performance

AAHYX vs. AAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX) and Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAHYX achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than AAMBX's 1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, AAHYX has outperformed AAMBX with an annualized return of 4.95%, while AAMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.

AAHYX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 6M: 3.87%
• 1Y: 10.90%
• 3Y*: 8.47%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 4.95%

AAMBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 7.56%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: 0.56%
• 10Y*: 1.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAHYX vs. AAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAHYX Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund	3.55%	9.57%	6.80%	9.27%	-12.64%	6.22%	6.67%	13.12%	-3.08%	8.98%
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund	1.88%	3.39%	2.70%	6.18%	-10.93%	1.99%	4.78%	7.38%	0.32%	4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AAHYX and AAMBX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 1997	0.08

Over the past year, AAHYX and AAMBX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

AAHYX vs. AAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAHYX

AAHYX Risk / Return Rank: 79
AAHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AAHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AAHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AAHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
AAHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

AAMBX

AAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 62
AAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
AAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAHYX vs. AAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX) and Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAHYX	AAMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	2.32	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	3.65	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.55	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	2.53	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.35	8.76	+5.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAHYX vs. AAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the AAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAHYX and AAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAHYX	AAMBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	2.32	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.12	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.41	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.46	+0.26

Drawdowns

AAHYX vs. AAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAHYX drawdown since its inception was -34.18%, smaller than the maximum AAMBX drawdown of -49.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAHYX and AAMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAHYX	AAMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.18%	-49.18%	+15.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.54%	-3.13%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.23%	-7.56%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.52%	-16.17%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.04%	-16.17%	-3.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.08%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-5.20%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.90%	-0.11%

Volatility

AAHYX vs. AAMBX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) at 1.30%. This indicates that AAHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAHYX	AAMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	1.30%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.40%	2.53%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.25%	3.42%	+0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.78%	4.77%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.02%	4.43%	+1.59%

AAHYX vs. AAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAHYX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than AAMBX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAHYX vs. AAMBX - Dividend Comparison

AAHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than AAMBX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAHYX Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund	3.67%	3.73%	3.83%	3.55%	3.10%	6.31%	2.44%	3.54%	5.72%	2.85%	3.39%	3.31%
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund	3.51%	4.65%	3.93%	2.58%	2.97%	2.66%	2.80%	3.35%	3.45%	3.40%	3.41%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAHYX and AAMBX in my portfolio?

AAHYX and AAMBX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAHYX or AAMBX?

AAHYX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to AAMBX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAHYX dropped -34.18% vs AAMBX's -49.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.