PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAGTX vs. BLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAGTX vs. BLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAGTX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAGTX achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than BLPAX's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AAGTX has outperformed BLPAX with an annualized return of 11.43%, while BLPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.


AAGTX

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.81%
YTD
8.45%
6M
9.00%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
11.43%

BLPAX

1D
-0.47%
1M
2.21%
YTD
7.09%
6M
7.64%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAGTX vs. BLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAGTX
American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund
8.45%19.16%14.37%18.95%-17.80%16.51%18.41%23.94%-5.86%21.63%
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
7.09%16.64%11.30%13.87%-13.60%13.87%13.16%19.53%-4.59%16.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AAGTX and BLPAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.97

The correlation between AAGTX and BLPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAGTX vs. BLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAGTX
AAGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AAGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AAGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BLPAX
BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAGTX vs. BLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAGTX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAGTXBLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.60

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.82

11.60

+0.21

AAGTX vs. BLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the BLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAGTX and BLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAGTXBLPAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.22

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.72

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.85

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.91

-0.37

Drawdowns

AAGTX vs. BLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAGTX drawdown since its inception was -50.03%, which is greater than BLPAX's maximum drawdown of -23.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAGTX and BLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAGTXBLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.03%

-23.21%

-26.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-7.26%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-10.62%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-20.65%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.54%

-23.21%

-5.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.47%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-2.92%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.62%

+0.24%

Volatility

AAGTX vs. BLPAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAGTX) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) at 2.70%. This indicates that AAGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAGTXBLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.70%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

6.83%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

8.52%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

10.41%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.12%

10.83%

+3.29%

AAGTX vs. BLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAGTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than BLPAX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAGTX vs. BLPAX - Dividend Comparison

AAGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, which matches BLPAX's 5.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAGTX
American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund
5.49%5.95%3.50%2.51%6.40%4.94%3.26%4.29%4.94%2.42%3.59%5.12%
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
5.44%5.83%3.59%2.30%6.01%4.97%2.56%3.83%4.69%3.48%3.66%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, AAGTX and BLPAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAGTX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to BLPAX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAGTX dropped -50.03% vs BLPAX's -23.21%.

BLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAGTX and BLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer