AAGIY vs. RYCEY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY).

Performance

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAGIY AIA Group Ltd ADR	8.53%	46.33%	-12.94%	-20.35%	12.33%	-16.82%	18.71%	30.08%	-2.70%	56.35%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	-1.91%	123.64%	88.21%	253.27%	-33.95%	2.53%	-82.05%	-12.69%	-7.35%	40.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AAGIY : $117.08B RYCEY : $129.57B
EPS AAGIY : $4.94 RYCEY : $0.99
PE Ratio AAGIY : 9.02 RYCEY : 15.57
PEG Ratio AAGIY : 0.78 RYCEY : 0.03
PS Ratio AAGIY : 1.97 RYCEY : 3.25
PB Ratio AAGIY : 2.71 RYCEY : 47.61
Total Revenue (TTM) AAGIY : $59.82B RYCEY : $40.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) AAGIY : $52.76B RYCEY : $10.10B
EBITDA (TTM) AAGIY : $15.90B RYCEY : $8.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAGIY achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's -1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, AAGIY has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 9.63%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 6.05% annualized return.

AAGIY

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 8.53%
• 6M: 15.87%
• 1Y: 51.31%
• 3Y*: 5.22%
• 5Y*: 0.50%
• 10Y*: 9.63%

RYCEY

• 1D: 5.83%
• 1M: -17.19%
• YTD: -1.91%
• 6M: -4.81%
• 1Y: 59.09%
• 3Y*: 105.06%
• 5Y*: 58.30%
• 10Y*: 6.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AAGIY vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAGIY

AAGIY Risk / Return Rank: 87
AAGIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AAGIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AAGIY Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AAGIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AAGIY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

RYCEY

RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 84
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAGIY	RYCEY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.61	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.15	+0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	2.54	+0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.54	8.86	+0.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAGIY Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAGIY and RYCEY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAGIY	RYCEY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.61	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	1.38	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.12	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	-0.25	+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between AAGIY and RYCEY is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

AAGIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than RYCEY's 0.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAGIY AIA Group Ltd ADR	2.08%	2.26%	4.91%	2.29%	1.70%	1.69%	1.29%	1.50%	1.46%	2.17%	3.26%	1.00%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	0.88%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.51%	1.56%	1.32%	1.55%	4.19%	14.44%

Drawdowns

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAGIY drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAGIY and RYCEY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAGIY	RYCEY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.79%	-99.07%	+43.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.57%	-21.75%	+5.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.45%	-62.01%	+7.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.79%	-94.64%	+38.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.16%	-80.53%	+71.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.62%	-84.27%	+69.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.23%	6.22%	-0.99%

Volatility

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) is 9.19%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 17.32%. This indicates that AAGIY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAGIY	RYCEY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.19%	17.32%	-8.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.94%	25.30%	-5.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.19%	37.09%	-8.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.52%	42.67%	-12.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.12%	48.90%	-19.78%

Financials

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AIA Group Ltd ADR and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AAGIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 16.98B and revenue of 16.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

AAGIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 4.37B and revenue of 16.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

AAGIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported a net income of 3.70B and revenue of 16.98B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.