PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAGIY vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAGIY achieves a -6.32% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 18.39% return. Over the past 10 years, AAGIY has underperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 7.53%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.64% annualized return.


AAGIY

1D
-0.13%
1M
-12.12%
YTD
-6.32%
6M
-9.77%
1Y
10.54%
3Y*
1.57%
5Y*
-2.96%
10Y*
7.53%

RYCEY

1D
-1.33%
1M
10.63%
YTD
18.39%
6M
18.01%
1Y
53.42%
3Y*
114.07%
5Y*
65.00%
10Y*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAGIY
AIA Group Ltd ADR
-6.32%46.33%-12.94%-20.35%12.33%-16.82%18.71%30.08%-2.70%56.35%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
18.39%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AAGIY and RYCEY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAGIY:

$99.33B

RYCEY:

$155.70B

EPS

AAGIY:

$4.94

RYCEY:

£0.99

PE Ratio

AAGIY:

7.65

RYCEY:

14.13

PEG Ratio

AAGIY:

0.66

RYCEY:

0.03

PS Ratio

AAGIY:

1.67

RYCEY:

2.95

PB Ratio

AAGIY:

2.30

RYCEY:

43.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAGIY:

$59.82B

RYCEY:

£40.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAGIY:

$52.76B

RYCEY:

£10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAGIY:

$15.90B

RYCEY:

£8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAGIY vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAGIY
AAGIY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AAGIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAGIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAGIY Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AAGIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAGIY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAGIYRYCEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.47

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

6.93

-5.27

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAGIY Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAGIY and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAGIY drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAGIY and RYCEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAGIYRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.79%

-99.07%

+43.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.49%

-21.75%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.90%

-23.37%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.73%

-62.01%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.79%

-94.64%

+38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.59%

-76.50%

+54.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

-84.14%

+69.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.36%

7.73%

-1.37%

Volatility

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

AIA Group Ltd ADR (AAGIY) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 9.75%. This indicates that AAGIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAGIYRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.89%

9.75%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.16%

32.89%

-12.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.65%

38.08%

-10.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.60%

43.47%

-12.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.17%

49.30%

-20.13%

Dividends

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

AAGIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than RYCEY's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAGIY
AIA Group Ltd ADR
2.61%2.26%4.91%2.29%1.70%1.69%1.29%1.50%1.46%2.17%3.26%1.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.69%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Financials

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AIA Group Ltd ADR and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20212022202320242025
16.98B
11.64B
(AAGIY) Total Revenue
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AAGIY values in USD, RYCEY values in GBP

AAGIY vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AIA Group Ltd ADR and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
27.4%
Portfolio components
AAGIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 16.98B and revenue of 16.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

AAGIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 4.37B and revenue of 16.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

AAGIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AIA Group Ltd ADR reported a net income of 3.70B and revenue of 16.98B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAGIY and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAGIY has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to RYCEY (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAGIY dropped -55.79% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.

RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAGIY and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer