AAFTX vs. SWIRX
AAFTX (American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund) and SWIRX (Schwab Target 2035 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, AAFTX returned 10.68%/yr vs 9.78%/yr for SWIRX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AAFTX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SWIRX.
Performance
AAFTX vs. SWIRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAFTX achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than SWIRX's 7.69% return. Over the past 10 years, AAFTX has outperformed SWIRX with an annualized return of 10.68%, while SWIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.78% annualized return.
AAFTX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 16.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
SWIRX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
AAFTX vs. SWIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAFTX American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund | 6.57% | 16.77% | 12.40% | 16.50% | -16.53% | 15.20% | 17.23% | 22.81% | -5.48% | 20.68% |
SWIRX Schwab Target 2035 Fund | 7.69% | 16.49% | 11.73% | 17.92% | -17.91% | 14.21% | 14.05% | 21.85% | -8.24% | 19.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAFTX and SWIRX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2008 | 0.97 |
The correlation between AAFTX and SWIRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAFTX vs. SWIRX — Risk / Return Rank
AAFTX
SWIRX
AAFTX vs. SWIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAFTX) and Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAFTX | SWIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.71 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 11.77 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAFTX vs. SWIRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAFTX drawdown since its inception was -49.89%, which is greater than SWIRX's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAFTX and SWIRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAFTX | SWIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.89% | -41.53% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.99% | -7.27% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.58% | -11.60% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.31% | -28.70% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.72% | -28.70% | +1.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.45% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -6.07% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.67% | -0.08% |
Volatility
AAFTX vs. SWIRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAFTX) is 3.34%, while Schwab Target 2035 Fund (SWIRX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that AAFTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAFTX | SWIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 3.59% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 7.77% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.96% | 9.53% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.50% | 13.64% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 13.51% | -0.78% |
AAFTX vs. SWIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAFTX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SWIRX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAFTX vs. SWIRX - Dividend Comparison
AAFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than SWIRX's 6.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAFTX American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund | 5.62% | 5.99% | 4.26% | 2.61% | 5.43% | 5.25% | 3.53% | 4.21% | 4.80% | 2.38% | 3.52% | 5.63% |
SWIRX Schwab Target 2035 Fund | 6.33% | 6.82% | 3.96% | 3.42% | 7.40% | 5.81% | 2.87% | 6.33% | 7.12% | 3.37% | 5.74% | 8.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, AAFTX and SWIRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWIRX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to AAFTX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAFTX dropped -49.89% vs SWIRX's -41.53%.
SWIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAFTX and SWIRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer