AAEQ vs. EBI
AAEQ (Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAEQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.
Performance
AAEQ vs. EBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 14.86% return.
AAEQ
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 34.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAEQ vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAEQ Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF | 9.45% | -1.99% |
EBI Longview Advantage ETF | 14.86% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAEQ and EBI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAEQ vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank
AAEQ
EBI
AAEQ vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAEQ | EBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
AAEQ vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum EBI drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and EBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAEQ | EBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.26% | -17.05% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.24% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -2.06% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility
AAEQ vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAEQ | EBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 12.13% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 17.93% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 17.93% | -4.26% |
AAEQ vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AAEQ vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison
AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than EBI's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAEQ Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF | 0.09% | 0.10% |
EBI Longview Advantage ETF | 0.92% | 1.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAEQ and EBI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAEQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAEQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for EBI.
EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.24% for EBI.
Find the right allocation for AAEQ and EBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer