PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAEQ vs. EBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAEQ vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 14.86% return.


AAEQ

1D
0.49%
1M
4.47%
YTD
9.45%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EBI

1D
0.21%
1M
3.43%
YTD
14.86%
6M
15.24%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAEQ vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
9.45%-1.99%
EBI
Longview Advantage ETF
14.86%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and EBI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAEQ

EBI
EBI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAEQ vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAEQ vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAEQEBIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

1.42

-0.25

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum EBI drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and EBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQEBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-17.05%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.24%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-2.06%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

Volatility

AAEQ vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQEBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

12.13%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

17.93%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

17.93%

-4.26%

AAEQ vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AAEQ vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than EBI's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
0.09%0.10%
EBI
Longview Advantage ETF
0.92%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAEQ and EBI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAEQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAEQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for EBI.

EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.24% for EBI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAEQ and EBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer