AAEKX vs. FRQHX
AAEKX (American Century One Choice Blend+ 2065 Portfolio) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, AAEKX returned 9.25%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for FRQHX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAEKX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.
Performance
AAEKX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAEKX achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 4.14% return.
AAEKX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 27.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- —
FRQHX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 10.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AAEKX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAEKX American Century One Choice Blend+ 2065 Portfolio | 11.31% | 20.17% | 15.20% | 16.86% | -16.94% | 10.08% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 4.14% | 10.01% | 4.68% | 8.75% | -12.22% | 3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAEKX and FRQHX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between AAEKX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAEKX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank
AAEKX
FRQHX
AAEKX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century One Choice Blend+ 2065 Portfolio (AAEKX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAEKX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.52 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.16 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 13.43 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAEKX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.60 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.56 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.80 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
AAEKX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAEKX drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEKX and FRQHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAEKX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.14% | -16.90% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -3.41% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.11% | -5.15% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | -16.90% | -9.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -3.79% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 0.80% | +1.30% |
Volatility
AAEKX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison
American Century One Choice Blend+ 2065 Portfolio (AAEKX) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 1.66%. This indicates that AAEKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAEKX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 1.66% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 3.41% | +5.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 4.14% | +7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 5.56% | +9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 5.76% | +8.97% |
AAEKX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAEKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAEKX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison
AAEKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than FRQHX's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAEKX American Century One Choice Blend+ 2065 Portfolio | 2.62% | 2.92% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 4.12% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 3.29% | 3.20% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 5.25% | 6.22% | 3.70% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAEKX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAEKX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAEKX dropped -26.14% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.
FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAEKX and FRQHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer