AADR vs. PJBF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. AADR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.

Performance

AADR vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AADR

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -1.60%
• 6M: -10.77%
• YTD: -4.11%
• 1Y: 5.84%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 6.72%
• 10Y*: 8.44%

PJBF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADR vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF	-1.19%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%

AADR vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AADR	PJBF
Healthcare	17.6%	11.5%
Basic Materials	16.7%	-
Financial Services	15.1%	2.5%
Industrials	12.4%	16.5%
Technology	9.9%	40.0%
Communication Services	9.3%	11.5%
Energy	8.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	13.8%
Utilities	2.7%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

AADR vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADR

AADR Risk / Return Rank: 14
AADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
AADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
AADR Omega Ratio Rank: 14
AADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
AADR Martin Ratio Rank: 13

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADR vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AADR	PJBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	—	—

Drawdowns

AADR vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and PJBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AADR	PJBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.01%	0.00%	-45.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.81%	0.00%	-14.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	0.00%	-9.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AADR	PJBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.80%	0.00%	+21.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.72%	0.00%	+21.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.13%	0.00%	+22.13%

AADR vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

AADR vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison

AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF	0.84%	0.49%	1.33%	0.74%	3.65%	0.92%	0.11%	0.58%	0.75%	0.74%	0.58%	0.81%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AADR or PJBF?

On fees, PJBF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AADR or PJBF?

PJBF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AADR or PJBF?

AADR has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

What is the main difference between AADR and PJBF?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.59% for PJBF.