AACAY vs. BABA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AACAY (AAC Technologies Holdings Inc) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. AACAY operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, AACAY returned -1.59%/yr vs 5.74%/yr for BABA. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AACAY vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (AACAY) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AACAY achieves a 21.83% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -13.21% return. Over the past 10 years, AACAY has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -1.59%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.74% annualized return.

AACAY

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 30.13%
• YTD: 21.83%
• 6M: 21.83%
• 1Y: 30.13%
• 3Y*: 46.77%
• 5Y*: -1.27%
• 10Y*: -1.59%

BABA

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -4.55%
• YTD: -13.21%
• 6M: -19.53%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: 16.70%
• 5Y*: -9.37%
• 10Y*: 5.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AACAY vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AACAY AAC Technologies Holdings Inc	21.83%	6.36%	65.03%	32.35%	-43.30%	-28.62%	-36.66%	56.71%	-67.60%	103.89%
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	-13.21%	75.80%	11.77%	-10.83%	-25.84%	-48.96%	9.73%	54.74%	-20.51%	96.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AACAY and BABA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014	0.34

The correlation between AACAY and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap AACAY : $6.99B BABA : $307.20B
EPS AACAY : $3.70 BABA : $33.90
PE Ratio AACAY : 1.64 BABA : 3.75
PEG Ratio AACAY : 0.05 BABA : 0.17
PS Ratio AACAY : 0.12 BABA : 0.38
PB Ratio AACAY : 0.29 BABA : 0.29
Total Revenue (TTM) AACAY : $58.80B BABA : $811.51B
Gross Profit (TTM) AACAY : $12.83B BABA : $332.88B
EBITDA (TTM) AACAY : $10.38B BABA : $112.44B

Return for Risk

AACAY vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AACAY

AACAY Risk / Return Rank: 58
AACAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
AACAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AACAY Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AACAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AACAY Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BABA

BABA Risk / Return Rank: 48
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AACAY vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (AACAY) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AACAY	BABA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	0.29	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.81	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.09	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	0.34	+0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.44	0.67	+0.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AACAY vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AACAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AACAY and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AACAY	BABA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57	0.29	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	-0.18	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.03	0.13	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.07	+0.33

Drawdowns

AACAY vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AACAY drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AACAY and BABA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AACAY	BABA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.59%	-80.09%	-13.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.08%	-36.77%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.94%	-36.77%	-6.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.09%	-72.48%	-8.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.59%	-80.09%	-13.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.71%	-57.76%	-13.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.70%	-37.51%	-4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.92%	18.62%	+2.30%

Volatility

AACAY vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (AACAY) has a higher volatility of 18.56% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 14.74%. This indicates that AACAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AACAY	BABA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.56%	14.74%	+3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.76%	28.96%	+7.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.97%	43.68%	+9.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.63%	51.36%	+1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.85%	43.38%	+7.47%

Dividends

AACAY vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

AACAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than BABA's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AACAY AAC Technologies Holdings Inc	0.74%	0.61%	0.27%	0.53%	0.00%	1.20%	0.24%	1.78%	3.95%	2.07%	3.48%	1.75%
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	1.57%	1.36%	1.96%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

AACAY vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AAC Technologies Holdings Inc and Alibaba Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AACAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AAC Technologies Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 18.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.

BABA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

AACAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AAC Technologies Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 1.78B and revenue of 18.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

BABA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

AACAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AAC Technologies Holdings Inc reported a net income of 1.61B and revenue of 18.16B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

BABA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AACAY and BABA in my portfolio?

AACAY and BABA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AACAY or BABA?

AACAY has higher volatility (18.56%) compared to BABA (14.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AACAY dropped -93.59% vs BABA's -80.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AACAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.