AACAY vs. BABA
Compare and contrast key facts about AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (AACAY) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA).
Performance
AACAY vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AACAY vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AACAY AAC Technologies Holdings Inc | -14.14% | 6.36% | 65.03% | 32.35% | -43.30% | -28.62% | -36.66% | 56.71% | -67.60% | 103.89% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -14.41% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Fundamentals
AACAY:
$4.97B
BABA:
$302.83B
AACAY:
$3.70
BABA:
$37.64
AACAY:
1.16
BABA:
3.33
AACAY:
0.03
BABA:
0.26
AACAY:
0.08
BABA:
0.30
AACAY:
0.20
BABA:
0.29
AACAY:
$58.80B
BABA:
$1.01T
AACAY:
$12.83B
BABA:
$411.95B
AACAY:
$10.38B
BABA:
$132.37B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AACAY having a -14.14% return and BABA slightly lower at -14.41%. Over the past 10 years, AACAY has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -4.11%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.31% annualized return.
AACAY
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- -14.14%
- 6M
- -25.82%
- 1Y
- -28.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- -2.22%
- 10Y*
- -4.11%
BABA
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -12.94%
- YTD
- -14.41%
- 6M
- -29.80%
- 1Y
- -3.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -10.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AACAY vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
AACAY
BABA
AACAY vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (AACAY) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AACAY | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | -0.08 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | 0.23 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.03 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | -0.10 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -0.24 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AACAY | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | -0.08 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | -0.20 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | 0.12 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.07 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between AACAY and BABA is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AACAY vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
AACAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than BABA's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AACAY AAC Technologies Holdings Inc | 0.71% | 0.61% | 0.27% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.24% | 1.78% | 3.95% | 2.07% | 3.48% | 1.75% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AACAY vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AACAY drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AACAY and BABA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AACAY | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.59% | -80.09% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.08% | -35.58% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.09% | -74.12% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.59% | -80.09% | -13.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.07% | -58.34% | -21.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.34% | -37.23% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.91% | 15.43% | +6.48% |
Volatility
AACAY vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (AACAY) has a higher volatility of 18.67% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 12.47%. This indicates that AACAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AACAY | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.67% | 12.47% | +6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.51% | 29.36% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.78% | 45.97% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.93% | 51.12% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.30% | 43.22% | +7.08% |
Financials
AACAY vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AAC Technologies Holdings Inc and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AACAY vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison
AACAY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AAC Technologies Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 18.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 112.89B and revenue of 280.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
AACAY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AAC Technologies Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 1.78B and revenue of 18.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 18.44B and revenue of 280.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
AACAY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AAC Technologies Holdings Inc reported a net income of 1.61B and revenue of 18.16B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 16.16B and revenue of 280.91B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.