AAAZX vs. MGHYX

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

AAAZX (DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund) and MGHYX (DWS Global High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - AAAZX is a Global Allocation fund managed by DWS, while MGHYX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, AAAZX returned 7.17%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for MGHYX. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAAZX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for MGHYX.

Performance

AAAZX vs. MGHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) and DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAZX achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than MGHYX's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAZX has outperformed MGHYX with an annualized return of 7.17%, while MGHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.79% annualized return.

AAAZX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.54%
• 6M: 3.00%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 11.02%
• 5Y*: 5.20%
• 10Y*: 7.17%
• ALL TIME*: 4.64%

MGHYX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 1.64%
• YTD: 2.25%
• 1Y: 6.10%
• 3Y*: 7.98%
• 5Y*: 3.55%
• 10Y*: 4.79%
• ALL TIME*: 0.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

AAAZX vs. MGHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund	10.40%	13.14%	5.49%	2.64%	-9.57%	23.83%	3.91%	21.79%	-5.05%	14.97%
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund	2.25%	9.82%	6.99%	11.17%	-11.67%	3.22%	6.83%	16.36%	-1.85%	6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAZX and MGHYX is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2007	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between AAAZX and MGHYX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AAAZX vs. MGHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAAZX

AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 61
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

MGHYX

MGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 77
MGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
MGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAAZX vs. MGHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) and DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAZX	MGHYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.02	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	3.48	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.46	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	2.35	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	9.82	-2.13

AAAZX vs. MGHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the MGHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAZX and MGHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAAZX vs. MGHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAZX drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum MGHYX drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAZX and MGHYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAZX	MGHYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.45%	-53.47%	+13.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.78%	-2.69%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.06%	-4.33%	-5.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.52%	-15.93%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.44%	-21.84%	-7.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	0.00%	-3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.60%	-23.98%	+17.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	0.64%	+1.49%

Volatility

AAAZX vs. MGHYX - Volatility Comparison

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) at 0.89%. This indicates that AAAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAZX	MGHYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	0.89%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.95%	2.34%	+4.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.27%	3.13%	+6.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.07%	5.09%	+6.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.70%	5.84%	+6.86%

AAAZX vs. MGHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MGHYX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAZX vs. MGHYX - Dividend Comparison

AAAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than MGHYX's 5.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund	6.65%	4.15%	2.85%	2.40%	4.50%	2.62%	1.60%	2.07%	1.89%	1.79%	1.82%	2.53%
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund	5.77%	7.17%	5.58%	4.35%	5.81%	4.20%	5.81%	5.63%	6.96%	3.76%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAZX and MGHYX in my portfolio?

AAAZX and MGHYX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAAZX or MGHYX?

AAAZX has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to MGHYX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAZX dropped -40.45% vs MGHYX's -53.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.