SGOL vs. GLTR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).

SGOL and GLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SGOL is a passively managed fund by abrdn that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Sep 9, 2009. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. Both SGOL and GLTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SGOL vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SGOL vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF	8.62%	63.99%	26.90%	12.99%	-0.51%	-3.94%	25.03%	18.21%	-1.94%	12.86%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	6.38%	87.25%	20.63%	2.01%	-0.25%	-9.60%	29.52%	20.96%	-2.85%	12.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's 6.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGOL having a 14.11% annualized return and GLTR not far behind at 14.10%.

SGOL

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.99%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 21.22%
• 1Y: 49.63%
• 3Y*: 33.23%
• 5Y*: 21.84%
• 10Y*: 14.11%

GLTR

• 1D: 4.98%
• 1M: -14.74%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 32.20%
• 1Y: 68.93%
• 3Y*: 33.85%
• 5Y*: 18.37%
• 10Y*: 14.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOL vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

GLTR

Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

SGOL

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

Return for Risk

SGOL vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOL

SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 87
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 85
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOL vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGOL	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.87	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.11	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	2.38	+0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.02	8.28	+1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGOL vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOL and GLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGOL	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.87	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.25	0.80	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.70	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.34	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between SGOL and GLTR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SGOL vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGOL nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SGOL vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and GLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGOL	GLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.51%	-55.70%	+10.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.14%	-29.70%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-29.70%	+8.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.56%	-29.70%	+8.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.21%	-23.32%	+10.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.46%	-28.89%	+10.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	8.54%	-3.37%

Volatility

SGOL vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) is 10.97%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that SGOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGOL	GLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.97%	13.48%	-2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.00%	35.75%	-11.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.51%	37.11%	-9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.63%	23.16%	-5.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.84%	20.28%	-4.44%