AAAU vs. NGD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and New Gold Inc. (NGD).

AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018.

Performance

AAAU vs. NGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AAAU vs. NGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	10.48%	64.06%	26.91%	12.96%	-0.50%	-4.01%	25.02%	18.17%	9.20%
NGD New Gold Inc.	4.25%	251.21%	69.86%	48.98%	-34.67%	-31.51%	148.86%	16.28%	-25.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAU achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than NGD's 4.25% return.

AAAU

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -10.64%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 6M: 23.10%
• 1Y: 52.53%
• 3Y*: 33.97%
• 5Y*: 22.27%
• 10Y*: —

NGD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -31.88%
• YTD: 4.25%
• 6M: 24.73%
• 1Y: 148.77%
• 3Y*: 114.42%
• 5Y*: 38.53%
• 10Y*: 9.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AAAU vs. NGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 86
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 84

NGD

NGD Risk / Return Rank: 93
NGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
NGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
NGD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
NGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
NGD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAU vs. NGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAAU	NGD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.74	-0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.86	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.41	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	5.21	-2.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.02	19.02	-9.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAAU vs. NGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the NGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAU and NGD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAAU	NGD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.74	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.27	0.62	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.03	+1.15

Correlation

The correlation between AAAU and NGD is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AAAU vs. NGD - Dividend Comparison

Neither AAAU nor NGD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AAAU vs. NGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAU drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum NGD drawdown of -96.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAU and NGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAU	NGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.63%	-96.73%	+75.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.13%	-32.34%	+13.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.94%	-71.98%	+51.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.65%	-35.37%	+23.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.01%	-62.74%	+56.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.21%	8.87%	-3.66%

Volatility

AAAU vs. NGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) is 10.43%, while New Gold Inc. (NGD) has a volatility of 20.12%. This indicates that AAAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAU	NGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.43%	20.12%	-9.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.06%	50.95%	-26.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.50%	63.46%	-35.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.58%	62.32%	-44.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.92%	65.34%	-48.42%