AAAU vs. IAUI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. AAAU is passively managed, while IAUI is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AAAU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.

Performance

AAAU vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAU achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly higher than IAUI's 2.26% return.

AAAU

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: 3.83%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 32.55%
• 3Y*: 31.47%
• 5Y*: 18.60%
• 10Y*: —

IAUI

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -1.21%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 4.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAU vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	3.83%	28.36%
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	2.26%	20.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAU and IAUI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.96

Return for Risk

AAAU vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 34
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAU vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAAU	IAUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAAU	IAUI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	1.16	-0.07

Drawdowns

AAAU vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAU drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -16.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAU and IAUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAU	IAUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.63%	-16.88%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.97%	-13.27%	-3.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-3.49%	-2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAAU	IAUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.33%	20.28%	+6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.83%	20.28%	-2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	20.28%	-3.29%

AAAU vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAU vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison

AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.58%.

Position	TTM	2025
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	12.58%	6.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAU and IAUI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, AAAU and IAUI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, AAAU or IAUI?

On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAAU or IAUI?

AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAAU or IAUI?

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.58%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.

What is the main difference between AAAU and IAUI?

AAAU is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AAAU and 0.78% for IAUI.