AAAU vs. GOLI
AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) and GOLI (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price, while GOLI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. AAAU is passively managed, while GOLI is actively managed. Over the past year, AAAU returned 19.00% vs 2.36% for GOLI. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAAU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOLI.
Performance
AAAU vs. GOLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAU achieves a -7.29% return, which is significantly higher than GOLI's -10.70% return.
AAAU
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- YTD
- -7.29%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.76%
- 5Y*
- 16.76%
- 10Y*
- —
GOLI
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -14.24%
- YTD
- -10.70%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAU vs. GOLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | -7.29% | 38.06% |
GOLI Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -10.70% | 15.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAAU and GOLI is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.88 |
The correlation between AAAU and GOLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAAU vs. GOLI — Risk / Return Rank
AAAU
GOLI
AAAU vs. GOLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAAU | GOLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.05 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.09 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | 0.29 | +1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAAU vs. GOLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAU drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, roughly equal to the maximum GOLI drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAU and GOLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAAU | GOLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.14% | -25.88% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.14% | -25.88% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.86% | -20.59% | -5.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.40% | -5.11% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.63% | 8.28% | +2.35% |
Volatility
AAAU vs. GOLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) is 7.53%, while Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) has a volatility of 14.48%. This indicates that AAAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAAU | GOLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 14.48% | -6.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.96% | 23.37% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.68% | 25.07% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 23.26% | -5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 23.26% | -6.05% |
AAAU vs. GOLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAAU vs. GOLI - Dividend Comparison
AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOLI Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 51.67% | 37.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAAU and GOLI have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOLI has higher volatility (14.48%) compared to AAAU (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAU dropped -26.14% vs GOLI's -25.88%.
On 1-year performance, AAAU leads with 19.00% vs 2.36% for GOLI. On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AAAU has been the lower-risk option at 7.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 19.00% return vs 2.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOLI.
GOLI has the higher dividend yield at 51.67%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.
AAAU is categorized as Gold, while GOLI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AAAU and 0.99% for GOLI.
AAAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAAU and GOLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer