PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAATX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAATX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2010 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAATX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AAATX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.49%
YTD
4.17%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*
6.01%
ALL TIME*
5.25%

FRQHX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AAATX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AAATX
American Funds 2010 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.17%12.73%7.83%8.44%-9.50%9.02%8.84%4.51%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AAATX and FRQHX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.88

The correlation between AAATX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAATX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAATX
AAATX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AAATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAATX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AAATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAATX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAATX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2010 Target Date Retirement Fund (AAATX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAATXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

AAATX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAATX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAATXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

Volatility

AAATX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAATXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.65%

AAATX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAATX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAATX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

AAATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAATX
American Funds 2010 Target Date Retirement Fund
6.57%6.84%5.16%3.53%3.41%3.78%3.72%3.48%3.79%2.51%2.67%4.60%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
2.93%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAATX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAATX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer