AAAPX vs. MGHYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAAPX (DWS RREEF Real Assets C) and MGHYX (DWS Global High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - AAAPX is a Global Allocation fund managed by DWS, while MGHYX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, AAAPX returned 6.39%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for MGHYX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAAPX charges 1.97%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for MGHYX.

Performance

AAAPX vs. MGHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) and DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAPX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than MGHYX's 1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAPX has outperformed MGHYX with an annualized return of 6.39%, while MGHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.

AAAPX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 6M: 10.74%
• 1Y: 16.06%
• 3Y*: 10.58%
• 5Y*: 4.27%
• 10Y*: 6.39%

MGHYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 7.75%
• 3Y*: 8.30%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: 4.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAPX vs. MGHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAAPX DWS RREEF Real Assets C	10.36%	11.95%	4.44%	1.53%	-10.52%	22.45%	2.94%	20.53%	-6.01%	13.69%
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund	1.59%	9.82%	6.99%	11.17%	-11.67%	3.22%	6.83%	16.36%	-1.85%	6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAPX and MGHYX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007	0.44

The correlation between AAAPX and MGHYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AAAPX vs. MGHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAPX

AAAPX Risk / Return Rank: 42
AAAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
AAAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
AAAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
AAAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
AAAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

MGHYX

MGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 76
MGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
MGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAPX vs. MGHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) and DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAAPX	MGHYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.56	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	4.43	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.61	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.98	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.05	12.73	-2.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAAPX vs. MGHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the MGHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAPX and MGHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAAPX	MGHYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	2.56	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.71	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.85	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.03	+0.28

Drawdowns

AAAPX vs. MGHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAPX drawdown since its inception was -40.74%, smaller than the maximum MGHYX drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAPX and MGHYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAPX	MGHYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.74%	-53.47%	+12.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.69%	-2.69%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.49%	-4.33%	-6.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.42%	-15.93%	-7.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.51%	-21.84%	-7.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-0.16%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-24.12%	+16.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	0.63%	+0.94%

Volatility

AAAPX vs. MGHYX - Volatility Comparison

DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) at 0.88%. This indicates that AAAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAPX	MGHYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	0.88%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	2.31%	+4.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.99%	3.12%	+5.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.10%	5.08%	+7.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.71%	5.90%	+6.81%

AAAPX vs. MGHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAPX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MGHYX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAPX vs. MGHYX - Dividend Comparison

AAAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than MGHYX's 5.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAPX DWS RREEF Real Assets C	1.15%	1.27%	1.48%	1.33%	3.38%	1.57%	0.60%	1.09%	0.83%	0.84%	1.07%	1.36%
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund	5.69%	7.17%	5.58%	4.35%	5.81%	4.20%	5.81%	5.63%	6.96%	3.76%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAPX and MGHYX in my portfolio?

AAAPX and MGHYX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAAPX or MGHYX?

AAAPX has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to MGHYX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAPX dropped -40.74% vs MGHYX's -53.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.