AAAGX vs. THMBX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAAGX (Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund) and THMBX (Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - AAAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while THMBX is a High Yield Muni fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 5 years, AAAGX returned 11.83%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for THMBX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAAGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for THMBX.

Performance

AAAGX vs. THMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund (THMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly higher than THMBX's 2.76% return.

AAAGX

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 3.45%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 19.01%
• 3Y*: 24.16%
• 5Y*: 11.83%
• 10Y*: 17.52%

THMBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 6M: 3.28%
• 1Y: 8.44%
• 3Y*: 5.05%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAGX vs. THMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	3.45%	16.12%	39.55%	46.09%	-34.10%	22.05%	42.49%	31.64%	-2.01%
THMBX Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund	2.76%	2.83%	5.85%	7.01%	-15.19%	6.59%	3.18%	10.15%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAGX and THMBX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018	0.08

Return for Risk

AAAGX vs. THMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAGX

AAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 18
AAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
AAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
AAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

THMBX

THMBX Risk / Return Rank: 80
THMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
THMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
THMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
THMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
THMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAGX vs. THMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund (THMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAGX	THMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.52	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	4.19	-2.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.63	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	3.17	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	11.19	-7.17

AAAGX vs. THMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the THMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAGX and THMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAAGX vs. THMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than THMBX's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and THMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAGX	THMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.98%	-21.08%	-43.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-2.71%	-14.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.44%	-7.31%	-16.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.41%	-21.08%	-19.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.82%	0.00%	-2.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.83%	-5.36%	-18.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.07%	0.77%	+4.30%

Volatility

AAAGX vs. THMBX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund (THMBX) at 0.84%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAGX	THMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	0.84%	+5.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.40%	2.44%	+10.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.94%	3.42%	+13.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.88%	5.21%	+17.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.79%	5.75%	+16.04%

AAAGX vs. THMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than THMBX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAGX vs. THMBX - Dividend Comparison

AAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than THMBX's 4.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	3.64%	3.77%	14.46%	3.55%	9.38%	6.93%	7.74%	5.39%	12.26%	0.00%	0.60%
THMBX Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund	4.29%	4.31%	4.10%	2.81%	3.11%	2.77%	2.92%	2.93%	2.78%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAGX and THMBX in my portfolio?

AAAGX and THMBX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAAGX or THMBX?

AAAGX has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to THMBX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAGX dropped -64.98% vs THMBX's -21.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.