PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAGX vs. LUBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAAGX vs. LUBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAAGX vs. LUBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAAGX
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund
-10.59%16.12%39.55%46.09%-34.10%22.05%42.49%31.64%1.43%24.42%
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
-0.95%7.57%2.93%8.11%-16.07%-0.76%11.61%13.20%-2.60%5.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a -10.59% return, which is significantly lower than LUBIX's -0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX has outperformed LUBIX with an annualized return of 15.09%, while LUBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.79% annualized return.


AAAGX

1D
3.77%
1M
-5.37%
YTD
-10.59%
6M
-9.72%
1Y
14.71%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
15.09%

LUBIX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAAGX vs. LUBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than LUBIX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAAGX vs. LUBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAGX
AAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
AAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LUBIX
LUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAGX vs. LUBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAAGXLUBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

0.91

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.29

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.45

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.19

4.73

-1.54

AAAGX vs. LUBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the LUBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAGX and LUBIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAAGXLUBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

0.91

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.07

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.50

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.65

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between AAAGX and LUBIX is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

AAAGX vs. LUBIX - Dividend Comparison

AAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than LUBIX's 3.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAGX
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund
4.21%3.77%14.46%3.55%9.38%6.93%7.74%5.39%12.26%0.00%0.60%0.00%
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
3.92%4.20%4.13%3.06%3.30%4.18%5.21%3.42%3.44%2.99%3.16%3.40%

Drawdowns

AAAGX vs. LUBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than LUBIX's maximum drawdown of -23.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and LUBIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAGXLUBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.98%

-23.52%

-41.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-3.22%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.41%

-22.12%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.41%

-22.12%

-18.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.61%

-2.39%

-11.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-3.80%

-20.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

0.98%

+3.92%

Volatility

AAAGX vs. LUBIX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) at 1.80%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAAGXLUBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

1.80%

+5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

2.79%

+9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

4.59%

+18.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.79%

6.38%

+16.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

5.62%

+16.03%