AAAGX vs. GLDI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAAGX (Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund) and GLDI (Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN) are both funds - AAAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while GLDI is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX returned 17.25%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for GLDI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAAGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GLDI.

Performance

AAAGX vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than GLDI's 2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX has outperformed GLDI with an annualized return of 17.25%, while GLDI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.

AAAGX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 5.62%
• 1Y: 23.58%
• 3Y*: 26.36%
• 5Y*: 13.92%
• 10Y*: 17.25%

GLDI

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: 4.42%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: 19.54%
• 5Y*: 11.15%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAGX vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	6.31%	16.12%	39.55%	46.09%	-34.10%	22.05%	42.49%	31.64%	1.43%	24.42%
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN	2.06%	34.25%	17.76%	8.93%	-1.11%	-3.42%	23.50%	14.40%	-0.54%	8.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAGX and GLDI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2013	0.03

The correlation between AAAGX and GLDI shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AAAGX vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAGX

AAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
AAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
AAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
AAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
AAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
AAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

GLDI

GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 38
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAGX vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAAGX	GLDI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.46	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.90	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.55	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.86	6.07	-1.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAAGX vs. GLDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the GLDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAGX and GLDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAAGX	GLDI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	1.46	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.99	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.79	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.37	-0.03

Drawdowns

AAAGX vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than GLDI's maximum drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and GLDI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAGX	GLDI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.98%	-32.26%	-32.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-13.73%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.44%	-13.73%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.41%	-14.07%	-26.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.41%	-14.94%	-25.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-7.37%	+7.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.87%	-14.00%	-9.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	3.50%	+1.51%

Volatility

AAAGX vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAGX	GLDI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	3.88%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.18%	12.87%	-0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	14.57%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.74%	11.31%	+11.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	11.35%	+10.36%

AAAGX vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAGX vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison

AAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than GLDI's 22.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	3.54%	3.77%	14.46%	3.55%	9.38%	6.93%	7.74%	5.39%	12.26%	0.00%	0.60%	0.00%
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN	22.37%	16.15%	10.45%	10.02%	13.73%	10.65%	14.25%	7.25%	5.33%	7.77%	17.26%	10.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAGX and GLDI in my portfolio?

AAAGX and GLDI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAAGX or GLDI?

GLDI has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to AAAGX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAGX dropped -64.98% vs GLDI's -32.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.