AAAGX vs. GLDI
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI).
AAAGX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Oct 29, 1999. GLDI is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2013.
Performance
AAAGX vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAAGX vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund | -10.59% | 16.12% | 39.55% | 46.09% | -34.10% | 22.05% | 42.49% | 31.64% | 1.43% | 24.42% |
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | 3.48% | 34.25% | 17.76% | 8.93% | -1.11% | -3.42% | 23.50% | 14.40% | -0.54% | 8.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a -10.59% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI's 3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX has outperformed GLDI with an annualized return of 15.09%, while GLDI has yielded a comparatively lower 9.36% annualized return.
AAAGX
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -9.72%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
GLDI
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAAGX vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAAGX vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank
AAAGX
GLDI
AAAGX vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAAGX | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 2.03 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 2.59 | -1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.42 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.05 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 11.71 | -8.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAAGX | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 2.03 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.17 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.83 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.38 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAAGX and GLDI is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AAAGX vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison
AAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than GLDI's 20.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund | 4.21% | 3.77% | 14.46% | 3.55% | 9.38% | 6.93% | 7.74% | 5.39% | 12.26% | 0.00% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | 20.19% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
Drawdowns
AAAGX vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than GLDI's maximum drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and GLDI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAAGX | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.98% | -32.26% | -32.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -13.73% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.41% | -14.07% | -26.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.41% | -14.94% | -25.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.61% | -6.08% | -7.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -14.11% | -9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 2.41% | +2.49% |
Volatility
AAAGX vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) is 7.01%, while Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that AAAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAAGX | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 9.60% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 12.03% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.01% | 13.97% | +9.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 10.99% | +11.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 11.24% | +10.41% |