AAACX vs. RMDFX
AAACX (Alpha Alternative Assets Fund) and RMDFX (Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, AAACX returned -1.24%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for RMDFX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAACX vs. RMDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAACX achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than RMDFX's 6.73% return.
AAACX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.13%
RMDFX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
AAACX vs. RMDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAACX Alpha Alternative Assets Fund | 4.68% | 6.27% | 5.85% | 3.75% | -20.30% | -6.20% | 4.86% | 3.51% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 6.73% | 18.85% | 1.45% | 8.01% | -6.84% | 4.20% | 5.10% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAACX and RMDFX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019 | 0.16 |
The correlation between AAACX and RMDFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAACX vs. RMDFX — Risk / Return Rank
AAACX
RMDFX
AAACX vs. RMDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Alternative Assets Fund (AAACX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAACX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.12 | 1.70 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 3.93 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 14.50 | -10.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAACX vs. RMDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAACX drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, which is greater than RMDFX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAACX and RMDFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAACX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -15.96% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.44% | -4.19% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.44% | -5.79% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.67% | -14.63% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -0.63% | -12.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | -3.30% | -13.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.14% | +0.68% |
Volatility
AAACX vs. RMDFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Alternative Assets Fund (AAACX) is 0.25%, while Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) has a volatility of 1.18%. This indicates that AAACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAACX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 1.18% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.10% | 4.15% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.62% | 4.86% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.99% | 6.34% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.37% | 6.22% | +2.15% |
Dividends
AAACX vs. RMDFX - Dividend Comparison
AAACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than RMDFX's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAACX Alpha Alternative Assets Fund | 5.56% | 5.15% | 3.11% | 7.84% | 4.68% | 12.02% | 5.87% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 4.34% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 0.78% | 5.37% | 2.28% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 2.16% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAACX and RMDFX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMDFX has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to AAACX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAACX dropped -28.76% vs RMDFX's -15.96%.
RMDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAACX and RMDFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer