PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAA vs. BSJU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAA vs. BSJU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) and Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAA vs. BSJU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AAA
AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF
0.88%4.92%6.85%8.94%1.71%
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-0.41%8.58%8.20%12.91%-2.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAA achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than BSJU's -0.41% return.


AAA

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.88%
6M
2.11%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*

BSJU

1D
1.12%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
1.01%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAA vs. BSJU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJU's 0.42% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAA vs. BSJU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAA
AAA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJU
BSJU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BSJU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJU Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJU Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAA vs. BSJU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) and Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAABSJUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.26

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

1.93

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.29

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.74

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.19

9.40

+7.80

AAA vs. BSJU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the BSJU Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAA and BSJU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAABSJUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.26

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

0.94

+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between AAA and BSJU is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AAA vs. BSJU - Dividend Comparison

AAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than BSJU's 6.64% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
AAA
AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF
5.00%5.11%6.17%6.11%2.78%1.06%0.32%
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.64%6.52%7.08%6.74%2.38%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AAA vs. BSJU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAA drawdown since its inception was -2.63%, smaller than the maximum BSJU drawdown of -7.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAA and BSJU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAABSJUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-7.51%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.25%

-4.14%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.24%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-1.12%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.77%

-0.46%

Volatility

AAA vs. BSJU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) is 0.64%, while Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that AAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSJU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAABSJUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

2.27%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

3.01%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

5.74%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.22%

8.04%

-5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.13%

8.04%

-5.91%