A200.AX vs. NTR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

A200.AX (Betashares Australia 200 ETF) is fund fund tracking the Solactive Australia 200 Index, while NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, A200.AX returned 7.68%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for NTR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

A200.AX vs. NTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

A200.AX is traded in AUD, while NTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NTR values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, A200.AX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than NTR's 5.70% return.

A200.AX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: —

NTR

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -9.73%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 8.56%
• 1Y: 8.15%
• 3Y*: 9.25%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

A200.AX vs. NTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF	1.27%	10.31%	11.57%	12.00%	-0.56%	17.90%	1.16%	22.87%	-3.83%
NTR Nutrien Ltd.	5.70%	32.92%	-8.62%	-20.13%	6.86%	70.20%	-3.67%	6.06%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between A200.AX and NTR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2018	0.08

Return for Risk

A200.AX vs. NTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

A200.AX

A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 16
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

NTR

NTR Risk / Return Rank: 59
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

A200.AX vs. NTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	A200.AX	NTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	0.26	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	0.59	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.07	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	0.41	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.56	0.97	+0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

A200.AX vs. NTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current A200.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the NTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of A200.AX and NTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	A200.AX	NTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	0.26	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.21	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.24	+0.32

Drawdowns

A200.AX vs. NTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum A200.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, smaller than the maximum NTR drawdown of -52.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A200.AX and NTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	A200.AX	NTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.55%	-52.63%	+17.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-19.98%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.22%	-32.01%	+18.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.79%	-52.63%	+37.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.58%	-27.55%	+22.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-22.74%	+18.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	8.42%	-5.13%

Volatility

A200.AX vs. NTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) is 4.17%, while Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that A200.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	A200.AX	NTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	11.33%	-7.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	25.98%	-16.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	31.80%	-19.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.67%	31.92%	-19.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.29%	31.89%	-16.60%

Dividends

A200.AX vs. NTR - Dividend Comparison

A200.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than NTR's 3.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF	3.40%	3.33%	3.13%	3.75%	6.35%	2.98%	2.54%	3.61%	1.40%
NTR Nutrien Ltd.	3.17%	3.53%	4.83%	3.76%	3.51%	2.45%	3.74%	3.67%	3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both A200.AX and NTR in my portfolio?

A200.AX and NTR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.