A200.AX vs. VTV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV).

A200.AX and VTV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. A200.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Australia 200 Index. It was launched on May 7, 2018. VTV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Prime Market Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both A200.AX and VTV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

A200.AX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

A200.AX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF	-1.44%	10.31%	11.57%	12.00%	-0.56%	17.90%	1.16%	22.87%	-3.83%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	-0.25%	6.90%	27.62%	9.40%	4.38%	33.95%	-6.65%	26.24%	3.08%

Different Trading Currencies

A200.AX is traded in AUD, while VTV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VTV values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, A200.AX achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's -0.25% return.

A200.AX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -7.08%
• YTD: -1.44%
• 6M: -2.30%
• 1Y: 11.92%
• 3Y*: 9.65%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: —

VTV

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: -0.25%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: 13.03%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

A200.AX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both A200.AX and VTV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

A200.AX

Betashares Australia 200 ETF

VTV

Vanguard Value ETF

Return for Risk

A200.AX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

A200.AX

A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 49
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 67
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

A200.AX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	A200.AX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.36	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	0.58	+0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.08	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	0.64	+0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.75	2.14	+1.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

A200.AX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current A200.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of A200.AX and VTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	A200.AX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	0.36	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	1.05	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.56	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between A200.AX and VTV is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

A200.AX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

A200.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than VTV's 2.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF	3.24%	3.33%	3.13%	3.75%	6.35%	2.98%	2.54%	3.61%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	2.02%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Drawdowns

A200.AX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum A200.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -47.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A200.AX and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	A200.AX	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.55%	-59.27%	+23.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-11.32%	+2.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.79%	-17.04%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.14%	-4.81%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-7.92%	+3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	2.50%	+0.38%

Volatility

A200.AX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.31%. This indicates that A200.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	A200.AX	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	3.31%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.74%	7.27%	+1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.08%	13.71%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.52%	12.52%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.31%	15.47%	-0.16%