PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 9W1A.DE achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than ESAP.DE's 10.03% return.


9W1A.DE

1D
-0.36%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
-8.14%
6M
-9.53%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
10Y*

ESAP.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
3.24%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.61%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
9W1A.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc
-8.14%30.93%15.68%-14.27%-27.31%-3.13%
ESAP.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD
10.03%17.48%24.85%26.98%-19.18%10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between 9W1A.DE and ESAP.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.40

The correlation between 9W1A.DE and ESAP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

9W1A.DE
9W1A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
9W1A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
9W1A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
9W1A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
9W1A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
9W1A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ESAP.DE
ESAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ESAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


9W1A.DEESAP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.42

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

3.35

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

14.32

-13.83

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 9W1A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the ESAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 9W1A.DE and ESAP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


9W1A.DEESAP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

2.34

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.88

-1.00

Drawdowns

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 9W1A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than ESAP.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1A.DE and ESAP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


9W1A.DEESAP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.54%

-34.23%

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.23%

-8.20%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.26%

-18.69%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.57%

-0.56%

-24.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.22%

-5.37%

-24.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.39%

1.93%

+6.46%

Volatility

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE) at 3.09%. This indicates that 9W1A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


9W1A.DEESAP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

3.09%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

8.58%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

11.76%

+8.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.58%

16.01%

+14.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.58%

17.99%

+12.59%

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

9W1A.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAP.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

9W1A.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 9W1A.DE nor ESAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


9W1A.DE and ESAP.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESAP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for 9W1A.DE.

9W1A.DE is categorized as China Equities, while ESAP.DE is S&P 500. 9W1A.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while ESAP.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1A.DE and 0.15% for ESAP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 9W1A.DE and ESAP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer