9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE
9W1A.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ASRD.DE (BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - 9W1A.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while ASRD.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 9W1A.DE returned 9.79%/yr vs 9.83%/yr for ASRD.DE. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 9W1A.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ASRD.DE.
Performance
9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
9W1A.DE is traded in USD, while ASRD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ASRD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 9W1A.DE achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than ASRD.DE's -0.56% return.
9W1A.DE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -8.14%
- 6M
- -9.53%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASRD.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 10.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- -1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1A.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc | -8.14% | 30.93% | 15.68% | -14.27% | -27.31% | -3.13% |
ASRD.DE BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged | -0.58% | 25.50% | -2.40% | 10.07% | -24.38% | -5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between 9W1A.DE and ASRD.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
9W1A.DE
ASRD.DE
9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 9W1A.DE | ASRD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 1.32 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 4.26 | -3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 9W1A.DE | ASRD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 1.07 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | -0.07 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9W1A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than ASRD.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1A.DE and ASRD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 9W1A.DE | ASRD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -42.65% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -7.85% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -13.31% | -13.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.57% | -7.67% | -16.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.22% | -19.90% | -10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.39% | 2.44% | +5.95% |
Volatility
9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (9W1A.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that 9W1A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 9W1A.DE | ASRD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 2.68% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.57% | 7.33% | +7.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 9.70% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 13.56% | +17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 13.40% | +17.18% |
9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
9W1A.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ASRD.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
9W1A.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 9W1A.DE nor ASRD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
9W1A.DE and ASRD.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASRD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASRD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for 9W1A.DE.
9W1A.DE is categorized as China Equities, while ASRD.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. 9W1A.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while ASRD.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1A.DE and 0.25% for ASRD.DE.
Find the right allocation for 9W1A.DE and ASRD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer