PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 9W1.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than ASRD.DE's 0.59% return.


9W1.DE

1D
-0.47%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
-6.89%
6M
-9.48%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
10Y*

ASRD.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.09%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
9W1.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-6.89%16.44%21.98%-17.19%-22.95%1.33%
ASRD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
0.59%11.16%3.52%6.69%-19.97%-1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between 9W1.DE and ASRD.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

9W1.DE
9W1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
9W1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
9W1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
9W1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
9W1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
9W1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRD.DE
ASRD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


9W1.DEASRD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.26

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

1.78

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

6.57

-6.29

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 9W1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 9W1.DE and ASRD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


9W1.DEASRD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

1.43

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.00

-0.10

Drawdowns

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 9W1.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.36%, which is greater than ASRD.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1.DE and ASRD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


9W1.DEASRD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.36%

-29.54%

-20.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

-4.77%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.53%

-8.03%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.23%

-4.16%

-21.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.28%

-13.13%

-14.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.37%

1.30%

+7.07%

Volatility

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) at 1.86%. This indicates that 9W1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


9W1.DEASRD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

1.86%

+5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

4.97%

+8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.92%

5.97%

+12.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.69%

9.06%

+19.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.69%

8.96%

+19.73%

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

9W1.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ASRD.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

9W1.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 9W1.DE nor ASRD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


9W1.DE and ASRD.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASRD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for 9W1.DE.

9W1.DE is categorized as China Equities, while ASRD.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. 9W1.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while ASRD.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1.DE and 0.25% for ASRD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 9W1.DE and ASRD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer