9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE
9W1.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and 36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - 9W1.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped while 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 9W1.DE returned 4.84%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for 36BZ.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 9W1.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 36BZ.DE.
Performance
9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 9W1.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than 36BZ.DE's 9.71% return.
9W1.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -9.48%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -6.89% | 16.44% | 21.98% | -17.19% | -22.95% | 1.33% |
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | -21.26% | 15.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between 9W1.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between 9W1.DE and 36BZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
9W1.DE
36BZ.DE
9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 9W1.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.38 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 5.10 | -4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 13.77 | -13.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 9W1.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 2.11 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.03 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9W1.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.36%, smaller than the maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1.DE and 36BZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 9W1.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.36% | -53.30% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -6.57% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.53% | -28.01% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.23% | -10.22% | -15.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -30.19% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 2.44% | +5.93% |
Volatility
9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) at 5.55%. This indicates that 9W1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 9W1.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 5.55% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 10.96% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.92% | 15.83% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 21.44% | +7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 22.10% | +6.59% |
9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
9W1.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
9W1.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 9W1.DE nor 36BZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
9W1.DE and 36BZ.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 9W1.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
9W1.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
9W1.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while 36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1.DE and 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for 9W1.DE and 36BZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer