PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSG.DE achieves a -5.74% return, which is significantly lower than CSH.PA's 0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, 8PSG.DE has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 11.21%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.66% annualized return.


8PSG.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.94%
YTD
-5.74%
6M
-6.86%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*
11.21%

CSH.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.87%
6M
0.94%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
0.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
8PSG.DE
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
-5.74%48.98%44.76%0.00%8.62%3.81%12.94%20.91%2.90%-1.90%
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.87%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.11%-0.70%-0.69%-0.61%-0.55%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSG.DE and CSH.PA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSG.DE
8PSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


8PSG.DECSH.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.93

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

10.93

-9.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.46

55.56

-53.10

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSG.DE and CSH.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.21%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSG.DE and CSH.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSG.DECSH.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.21%

-5.07%

-49.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.00%

-0.18%

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-0.18%

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-0.80%

-21.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

-3.60%

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

-0.02%

-21.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.97%

-1.51%

-22.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.48%

0.03%

+9.45%

Volatility

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 0.09%. This indicates that 8PSG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8PSG.DECSH.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

0.09%

+7.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.34%

0.39%

+20.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.08%

0.50%

+32.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

0.35%

+18.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.84%

0.27%

+21.57%

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

8PSG.DE vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither 8PSG.DE nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


8PSG.DE and CSH.PA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for 8PSG.DE.

8PSG.DE is categorized as Gold, while CSH.PA is Money Market. 8PSG.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 8PSG.DE and 0.10% for CSH.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8PSG.DE and CSH.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer