PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSG.DE vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

8PSG.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSG.DE achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.29% return.


8PSG.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
2.72%
6M
5.46%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*

ACWI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.77%
YTD
12.29%
6M
12.99%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
12.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
8PSG.DE
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
2.72%48.98%34.29%9.43%7.00%3.81%5.65%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.29%7.89%25.20%18.61%-13.33%27.54%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSG.DE and ACWI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.05

The correlation between 8PSG.DE and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (5 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSG.DE
8PSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


8PSG.DEACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.62

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

14.92

-10.32

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSG.DE and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSG.DE and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSG.DEACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-45.79%

+27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-7.11%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-20.51%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-20.51%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.00%

-1.66%

-13.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-6.42%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

1.72%

+4.82%

Volatility

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 4.25%. This indicates that 8PSG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8PSG.DEACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

4.25%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.17%

9.88%

+10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.14%

12.66%

+10.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

15.18%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

16.98%

-0.85%

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

8PSG.DE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

8PSG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
8PSG.DE
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.40%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


8PSG.DE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8PSG.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8PSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

8PSG.DE is categorized as Gold, while ACWI is Global Equities. 8PSG.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 8PSG.DE and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8PSG.DE and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer