PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSE.DE achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 2.80% return.


8PSE.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
0.15%
6M
4.45%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
15.46%
10Y*

4GLD.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
2.80%
6M
6.23%
1Y
31.21%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
8PSE.DE
Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
0.15%62.78%24.11%10.00%-2.18%-5.81%2.14%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.80%49.32%34.57%9.32%7.12%4.03%-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSE.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020

0.84

The correlation between 8PSE.DE and 4GLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSE.DE
8PSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
8PSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


8PSE.DE4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.26

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.82

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

4.63

-2.31

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSE.DE and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


8PSE.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

1.31

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

1.23

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.65

-0.48

Drawdowns

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, which is greater than 4GLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSE.DE and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSE.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.81%

-36.79%

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.81%

-16.54%

-34.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.81%

-16.54%

-34.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.81%

-16.54%

-34.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.31%

-14.95%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-11.83%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.27%

6.52%

+5.75%

Volatility

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that 8PSE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8PSE.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

5.09%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.01%

20.09%

+50.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

181.73%

23.06%

+158.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.63%

16.00%

+71.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.06%

14.37%

+66.69%

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSE.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

8PSE.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 8PSE.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


8PSE.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for 8PSE.DE.

8PSE.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM (EUR Hedged), while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for 8PSE.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8PSE.DE and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer