PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 84X0.DE achieves a 40.37% return, which is significantly higher than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.


84X0.DE

1D
-1.73%
1M
8.33%
YTD
40.37%
6M
44.02%
1Y
68.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IS3N.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
5.25%
YTD
25.82%
6M
27.45%
1Y
46.76%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
84X0.DE
iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc
40.37%19.85%9.62%7.38%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
25.82%17.14%13.87%3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between 84X0.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023

0.90

The correlation between 84X0.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

84X0.DE
84X0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
84X0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
84X0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
84X0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
84X0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
84X0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


84X0.DEIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.49

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.88

4.42

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.92

16.00

+5.92

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 84X0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 84X0.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


84X0.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

2.69

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.44

+1.33

Drawdowns

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 84X0.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 84X0.DE and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


84X0.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-35.06%

+15.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-10.52%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-2.49%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-9.30%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.91%

+0.22%

Volatility

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) at 7.16%. This indicates that 84X0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


84X0.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

7.16%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.93%

14.69%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

17.32%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

16.19%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

18.04%

-0.93%

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 84X0.DE and IS3N.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

84X0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 84X0.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, 84X0.DE and IS3N.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

84X0.DE and IS3N.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

84X0.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net), while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 84X0.DE and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer