PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

6AQQ.DE is traded in EUR, while GXLK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLK.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 6AQQ.DE having a 16.74% return and GXLK.L slightly higher at 17.23%. Over the past 10 years, 6AQQ.DE has outperformed GXLK.L with an annualized return of 20.24%, while GXLK.L has yielded a comparatively lower 19.09% annualized return.


6AQQ.DE

1D
1.19%
1M
-4.44%
6M
17.15%
YTD
16.74%
1Y
28.19%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
20.24%
ALL TIME*
20.20%

GXLK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.08%
6M
19.56%
YTD
17.23%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
22.84%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
19.09%
ALL TIME*
16.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
16.74%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.23%15.90%
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
17.23%9.84%30.75%51.46%-43.80%42.94%35.59%59.14%-3.02%28.62%

Correlation

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and GXLK.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.68

Over the past year, 6AQQ.DE and GXLK.L have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.68, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


6AQQ.DEGXLK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.91

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.97

4.68

+3.29

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6AQQ.DE and GXLK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum GXLK.L drawdown of -44.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and GXLK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


6AQQ.DEGXLK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-44.73%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-15.74%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-30.29%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-44.73%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

-44.73%

+13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-8.58%

+4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-10.29%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

6.42%

-2.89%

Volatility

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) is 6.04%, while SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that 6AQQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXLK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


6AQQ.DEGXLK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

7.48%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

16.51%

-3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

21.80%

-4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.04%

25.12%

-5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

25.61%

-5.87%

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLK.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

6AQQ.DE vs. GXLK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 6AQQ.DE nor GXLK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, 6AQQ.DE and GXLK.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLK.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLK.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

6AQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GXLK.L is Technology Equities. 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while GXLK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE and 0.15% for GXLK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 6AQQ.DE and GXLK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer