PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5QQQ.L is traded in GBp, while QYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5QQQ.L achieves a 21.95% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD.L's 4.85% return.


5QQQ.L

1D
-10.98%
1M
-28.94%
6M
19.94%
YTD
21.95%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
35.36%
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD.L

1D
-1.99%
1M
-3.73%
6M
3.25%
YTD
4.85%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
5QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
21.95%-4.78%76.84%401.35%-38.49%
QYLD.L
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.85%-2.14%26.95%17.09%-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between 5QQQ.L and QYLD.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.47

The correlation between 5QQQ.L and QYLD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5QQQ.L
5QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
5QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD.L
QYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


5QQQ.LQYLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

3.39

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.34

11.47

-9.13

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the QYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5QQQ.L and QYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, which is greater than QYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQQ.L and QYLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5QQQ.LQYLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.97%

-24.76%

-71.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.68%

-4.66%

-52.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.23%

-24.76%

-55.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.51%

-4.66%

-51.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.79%

-5.50%

-68.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.74%

1.37%

+21.37%

Volatility

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) has a higher volatility of 31.30% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QYLD.L) at 5.02%. This indicates that 5QQQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5QQQ.LQYLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.30%

5.02%

+26.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.87%

8.81%

+59.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.51%

10.67%

+74.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

103.62%

16.77%

+86.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

103.62%

16.77%

+86.85%

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5QQQ.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

5QQQ.L vs. QYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

5QQQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%.


PositionTTM202520242023
5QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD.L
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
11.85%11.41%12.28%10.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


5QQQ.L and QYLD.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLD.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLD.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5QQQ.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5QQQ.L and 0.45% for QYLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5QQQ.L and QYLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer