PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5QQQ.L is traded in GBp, while 3MSE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3MSE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5QQQ.L achieves a 92.08% return, which is significantly higher than 3MSE.L's -43.52% return.


5QQQ.L

1D
-3.36%
1M
46.02%
YTD
92.08%
6M
79.80%
1Y
213.52%
3Y*
69.87%
5Y*
10Y*

3MSE.L

1D
1.83%
1M
11.71%
YTD
-43.52%
6M
-41.91%
1Y
-43.35%
3Y*
-9.45%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
5QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
92.08%-4.78%76.82%401.38%-95.59%15.05%
3MSE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR
-43.52%-1.06%15.49%169.97%-75.05%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between 5QQQ.L and 3MSE.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between 5QQQ.L and 3MSE.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5QQQ.L
5QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
5QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

3MSE.L
3MSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
3MSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3MSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
3MSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3MSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3MSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5QQQ.L3MSE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.95

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

-0.57

+3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

-1.00

+8.75

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the 3MSE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5QQQ.L and 3MSE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5QQQ.L3MSE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

-0.55

+2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.02

-0.06

Drawdowns

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, which is greater than 3MSE.L's maximum drawdown of -81.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQQ.L and 3MSE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5QQQ.L3MSE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.97%

-81.40%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.48%

-76.03%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.23%

-76.03%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.50%

-62.74%

+31.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.65%

-37.24%

-37.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.40%

43.52%

-16.12%

Volatility

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) is 23.67%, while Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L) has a volatility of 30.92%. This indicates that 5QQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3MSE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5QQQ.L3MSE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.67%

30.92%

-7.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.95%

75.07%

-18.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.96%

79.12%

+9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.45%

78.19%

+27.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.45%

80.00%

+25.45%

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 5QQQ.L and 3MSE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

5QQQ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5QQQ.L nor 3MSE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5QQQ.L and 3MSE.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5QQQ.L and 3MSE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

5QQQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while 3MSE.L is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5QQQ.L and 3MSE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer