3MSE.L vs. JD3.L
3MSE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR) and JD3.L (Leverage Shares 3x JD.Com ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3MSE.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index while JD3.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x JD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3MSE.L returned -9.32%/yr vs -58.64%/yr for JD3.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3MSE.L vs. JD3.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3MSE.L is traded in EUR, while JD3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JD3.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3MSE.L achieves a -44.05% return, which is significantly lower than JD3.L's -1.59% return.
3MSE.L
- 1D
- -10.64%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- -44.05%
- 6M
- -43.06%
- 1Y
- -45.21%
- 3Y*
- -9.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
JD3.L
- 1D
- -10.77%
- 1M
- -10.23%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -15.48%
- 1Y
- -49.83%
- 3Y*
- -58.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3MSE.L vs. JD3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3MSE.L Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR | -44.05% | -6.09% | 20.99% | 175.47% | -76.35% | 128.88% |
JD3.L Leverage Shares 3x JD.Com ETP Securities | -1.59% | -73.05% | -23.47% | -94.17% | -89.42% | -39.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3MSE.L and JD3.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3MSE.L vs. JD3.L — Risk / Return Rank
3MSE.L
JD3.L
3MSE.L vs. JD3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x JD.Com ETP Securities (JD3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3MSE.L | JD3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.69 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.16 | +0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3MSE.L | JD3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | -0.50 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.47 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
3MSE.L vs. JD3.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3MSE.L drawdown since its inception was -82.27%, smaller than the maximum JD3.L drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MSE.L and JD3.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3MSE.L | JD3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.27% | -99.97% | +17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.12% | -71.77% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.12% | -96.76% | +20.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.40% | -99.95% | +36.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.77% | -88.64% | +50.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.57% | 42.77% | +0.80% |
Volatility
3MSE.L vs. JD3.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L) is 30.83%, while Leverage Shares 3x JD.Com ETP Securities (JD3.L) has a volatility of 43.91%. This indicates that 3MSE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JD3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3MSE.L | JD3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.83% | 43.91% | -13.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.05% | 71.67% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.14% | 99.04% | -19.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.61% | 161.54% | -82.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.19% | 161.54% | -81.35% |
3MSE.L vs. JD3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3MSE.L and JD3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3MSE.L vs. JD3.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3MSE.L nor JD3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3MSE.L and JD3.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3MSE.L and JD3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3MSE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index, while JD3.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x JD Index.
Find the right allocation for 3MSE.L and JD3.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer