PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5QQE.L achieves a 26.11% return, which is significantly lower than 3APE.L's 52.08% return.


5QQE.L

1D
-10.81%
1M
-27.47%
6M
22.98%
YTD
26.11%
1Y
57.14%
3Y*
35.97%
5Y*
10Y*

3APE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
33.30%
6M
81.94%
YTD
52.08%
1Y
183.21%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
5QQE.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR
26.11%-9.77%85.15%410.76%-95.82%16.44%
3APE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR
52.08%-31.84%78.10%157.67%-74.17%-2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between 5QQE.L and 3APE.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between 5QQE.L and 3APE.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5QQE.L
5QQE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
5QQE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
5QQE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

3APE.L
3APE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
3APE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3APE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
3APE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
3APE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
3APE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


5QQE.L3APE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

4.44

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

9.77

-7.20

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5QQE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the 3APE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5QQE.L and 3APE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5QQE.L drawdown since its inception was -96.05%, which is greater than 3APE.L's maximum drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQE.L and 3APE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5QQE.L3APE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.05%

-76.86%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.00%

-41.29%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.99%

-73.89%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.51%

0.00%

-55.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.73%

-35.41%

-37.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.18%

18.76%

+3.42%

Volatility

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities EUR (5QQE.L) has a higher volatility of 32.83% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) at 31.14%. This indicates that 5QQE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3APE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5QQE.L3APE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.83%

31.14%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.05%

60.65%

+8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.71%

78.28%

+8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.72%

80.56%

+26.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.72%

83.26%

+23.46%

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 5QQE.L and 3APE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

5QQE.L vs. 3APE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5QQE.L nor 3APE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5QQE.L and 3APE.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5QQE.L and 3APE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

5QQE.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while 3APE.L is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5QQE.L and 3APE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer