PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5HED.DE is traded in USD, while LCUS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LCUS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


5HED.DE

1D
1.38%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
1.60%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*

LCUS.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
5HED.DE
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
-1.48%4.29%4.19%16.05%-16.59%22.07%23.80%31.15%-7.82%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%5.58%25.27%26.85%-20.50%26.95%19.75%31.31%-9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between 5HED.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2018

0.78

The correlation between 5HED.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HED.DE
5HED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
5HED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5HED.DELCUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5HED.DELCUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

Drawdowns

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5HED.DELCUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

Volatility

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5HED.DELCUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HED.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

5HED.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HED.DE nor LCUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
5HED.DE
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.84%0.78%2.27%1.12%1.52%1.10%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


5HED.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HED.DE.

5HED.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HED.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5HED.DE and LCUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer