PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
540J.DE vs. AMED.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF EUR (540J.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 540J.DE achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, 540J.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 8.74%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.


540J.DE

1D
1.16%
1M
0.54%
YTD
4.11%
6M
7.57%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
8.74%

AMED.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
5.71%
YTD
16.87%
6M
18.51%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
540J.DE
Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF EUR
4.11%18.35%3.72%10.70%-12.88%29.27%1.18%35.15%-4.77%7.46%
AMED.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)
16.87%20.15%5.95%16.68%-10.71%20.90%-1.35%27.22%-12.98%11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between 540J.DE and AMED.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.68

The correlation between 540J.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

540J.DE
540J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
540J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
540J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
540J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
540J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
540J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AMED.DE
AMED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AMED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF EUR (540J.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


540J.DEAMED.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.49

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.60

9.40

-5.80

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 540J.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 540J.DE and AMED.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


540J.DEAMED.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.74

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.65

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.57

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.47

+0.17

Drawdowns

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 540J.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 540J.DE and AMED.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


540J.DEAMED.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-38.35%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-10.56%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-14.07%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.64%

-24.06%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.99%

-38.35%

+12.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-0.17%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-6.69%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.81%

+0.71%

Volatility

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF EUR (540J.DE) is 4.33%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that 540J.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


540J.DEAMED.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

5.61%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

12.64%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

15.19%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

15.87%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

17.00%

-2.97%

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 540J.DE and AMED.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

540J.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 540J.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


540J.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

540J.DE and AMED.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

540J.DE tracks MSCI Switzerland, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 540J.DE and AMED.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer