PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
500U.L vs. SPXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 500U.L having a 10.41% return and SPXD.L slightly higher at 10.44%.


500U.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.27%
YTD
10.41%
6M
10.80%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.69%

SPXD.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.27%
YTD
10.44%
6M
10.84%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.41%17.98%24.83%26.85%-19.06%30.19%18.05%13.33%
SPXD.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
10.44%17.53%25.57%26.91%-18.50%29.67%17.90%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between 500U.L and SPXD.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019

0.96

The correlation between 500U.L and SPXD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
500U.L
SPXD.L

Technology

35.6%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

500U.L
35.6%
SPXD.L
35.6%

Financial Services

500U.L
11.8%
SPXD.L
11.8%

Communication Services

500U.L
11.2%
SPXD.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

500U.L
10.1%
SPXD.L
10.1%

Healthcare

500U.L
8.5%
SPXD.L
8.5%

Industrials

500U.L
8.3%
SPXD.L
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

500U.L
4.9%
SPXD.L
4.9%

Energy

500U.L
3.5%
SPXD.L
3.5%

Utilities

500U.L
2.4%
SPXD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

500U.L
1.9%
SPXD.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

500U.L
1.8%
SPXD.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

500U.L vs. SPXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

500U.L
500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXD.L
SPXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


500U.LSPXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.31

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

14.56

+0.05

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 500U.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 500U.L and SPXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


500U.LSPXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.41

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.88

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.93

+0.29

Drawdowns

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 500U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXD.L drawdown of -33.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500U.L and SPXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


500U.LSPXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.04%

-33.98%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-8.35%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.29%

-18.29%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-24.17%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.51%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-5.06%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.91%

0.00%

Volatility

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


500U.LSPXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.10%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

8.44%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

11.46%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

15.83%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

17.70%

+0.56%

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

500U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

500U.L vs. SPXD.L - Dividend Comparison

500U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXD.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
1.08%1.16%1.31%1.51%1.68%1.30%1.55%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, 500U.L and SPXD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPXD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500U.L and 0.05% for SPXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 500U.L and SPXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer