500G.L vs. TNOW.L
500G.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) and TNOW.L (Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)) are both exchange-traded funds - 500G.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500, while TNOW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 500G.L returned 16.24%/yr vs 24.94%/yr for TNOW.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 500G.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for TNOW.L.
Performance
500G.L vs. TNOW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
500G.L is traded in GBp, while TNOW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TNOW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 500G.L achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than TNOW.L's 24.75% return. Over the past 10 years, 500G.L has underperformed TNOW.L with an annualized return of 16.24%, while TNOW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.94% annualized return.
500G.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 16.24%
TNOW.L
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 24.75%
- 6M
- 22.56%
- 1Y
- 52.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.03%
- 5Y*
- 22.34%
- 10Y*
- 24.94%
500G.L vs. TNOW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.57% | 9.44% | 27.44% | 19.89% | -8.86% | 31.35% | 13.81% | 27.01% | 0.05% | 10.79% |
TNOW.L Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) | 24.75% | 12.99% | 36.35% | 46.52% | -23.68% | 31.17% | 39.58% | 40.70% | 2.25% | 25.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between 500G.L and TNOW.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between 500G.L and TNOW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
500G.L vs. TNOW.L — Risk / Return Rank
500G.L
TNOW.L
500G.L vs. TNOW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) and Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 500G.L | TNOW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.42 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 3.07 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.27 | 7.82 | +7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 500G.L | TNOW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 2.53 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.98 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | 1.15 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.09 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
500G.L vs. TNOW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 500G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, smaller than the maximum TNOW.L drawdown of -27.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500G.L and TNOW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 500G.L | TNOW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.52% | -27.89% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -16.96% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -27.89% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -27.89% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.52% | -27.89% | +2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -2.22% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -5.09% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 6.69% | -4.78% |
Volatility
500G.L vs. TNOW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) is 2.65%, while Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that 500G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNOW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 500G.L | TNOW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 7.86% | -5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 15.57% | -8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 20.59% | -10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 22.69% | -8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 21.62% | -6.08% |
500G.L vs. TNOW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
500G.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TNOW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
500G.L vs. TNOW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 500G.L nor TNOW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
500G.L and TNOW.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 500G.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
500G.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for TNOW.L.
500G.L is categorized as S&P 500, while TNOW.L is Technology Equities. 500G.L tracks S&P 500, while TNOW.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500G.L and 0.30% for TNOW.L.
Find the right allocation for 500G.L and TNOW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer