PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
500G.L vs. SPY5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

500G.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

500G.L is traded in GBp, while SPY5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 500G.L achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than SPY5.L's 9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, 500G.L has underperformed SPY5.L with an annualized return of 12.62%, while SPY5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.


500G.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.96%
YTD
10.65%
6M
10.84%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
12.62%

SPY5.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.76%
6M
9.80%
1Y
26.51%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

500G.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
500G.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.65%9.44%27.44%19.89%-8.86%31.35%13.81%27.01%-25.34%21.51%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist)
9.76%9.06%27.55%20.31%-9.01%30.50%14.06%25.47%0.15%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between 500G.L and SPY5.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2012

0.69

The correlation between 500G.L and SPY5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

500G.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

500G.L
500G.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
500G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
500G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
500G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
500G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY5.L
SPY5.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

500G.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


500G.LSPY5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.67

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

12.28

-10.84

500G.L vs. SPY5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 500G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 500G.L and SPY5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

500G.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 500G.L drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than SPY5.L's maximum drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500G.L and SPY5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


500G.LSPY5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-25.97%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.61%

-7.19%

-21.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.61%

-21.10%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.61%

-21.10%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

-25.97%

-9.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.38%

-1.34%

-15.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-3.25%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.92%

2.15%

+16.77%

Volatility

500G.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) is 3.59%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that 500G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


500G.LSPY5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

4.03%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

9.16%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

12.18%

+31.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

15.44%

+8.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

16.33%

+5.76%

500G.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

500G.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

500G.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison

500G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
500G.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.93%0.97%1.06%1.19%1.40%0.99%1.28%1.44%1.77%1.51%1.64%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


500G.L and SPY5.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500G.L.

500G.L tracks S&P 500, while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500G.L and 0.03% for SPY5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 500G.L and SPY5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer