500G.L vs. PQVG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

500G.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) and PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - 500G.L tracks the S&P 500 while PQVG.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 500G.L returned 15.05%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for PQVG.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 500G.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVG.L.

Performance

500G.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 500G.L achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.79% return.

500G.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 5.53%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 10.49%
• 1Y: 29.21%
• 3Y*: 19.12%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: 16.24%

PQVG.L

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 5.36%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 6M: 17.07%
• 1Y: 24.01%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

500G.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.57%	9.44%	27.44%	19.89%	-8.86%	31.35%	13.81%	27.01%	0.05%	9.37%
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	16.79%	5.84%	32.29%	0.98%	12.54%	27.78%	4.44%	21.16%	-1.98%	14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between 500G.L and PQVG.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between 500G.L and PQVG.L has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

500G.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

500G.L

500G.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
500G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
500G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
500G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
500G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
500G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

PQVG.L

PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

500G.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	500G.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	2.31	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	3.28	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.41	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	5.82	-1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.27	17.49	-2.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

500G.L vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 500G.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 500G.L and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	500G.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	2.31	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	1.12	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	0.89	+0.18

Drawdowns

500G.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 500G.L drawdown since its inception was -25.52%, roughly equal to the maximum PQVG.L drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500G.L and PQVG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	500G.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.52%	-25.88%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.12%	-4.11%	-3.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.12%	-17.44%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.12%	-17.44%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	0.00%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.29%	-4.17%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	1.37%	+0.54%

Volatility

500G.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500G.L) is 2.65%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that 500G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	500G.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	2.79%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.13%	7.88%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	10.37%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.31%	14.89%	-0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.54%	16.24%	-0.70%

500G.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

500G.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

500G.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

500G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
500G.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.77%	0.82%	0.82%	1.61%	1.77%	0.87%	1.59%	1.41%	1.30%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 500G.L and PQVG.L in my portfolio?

500G.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 500G.L or PQVG.L?

On fees, 500G.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 500G.L or PQVG.L?

500G.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

What is the main difference between 500G.L and PQVG.L?

500G.L tracks S&P 500, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500G.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.