4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L
4UBP.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) are both exchange-traded funds - 4UBP.DE is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond, while SGLP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 4UBP.DE returned 0.76%/yr vs 19.71%/yr for SGLP.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 4UBP.DE charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLP.L.
Performance
4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
4UBP.DE is traded in EUR, while SGLP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4UBP.DE achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than SGLP.L's 4.89% return.
4UBP.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLP.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 30.28%
- 3Y*
- 27.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4UBP.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.25% | -2.18% | 6.73% | 5.80% | -13.17% | 3.83% | -2.06% |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | 4.89% | 45.59% | 34.32% | 9.54% | 6.07% | 3.44% | -1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4UBP.DE and SGLP.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between 4UBP.DE and SGLP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
4UBP.DE
SGLP.L
4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 4UBP.DE | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.75 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 4.56 | -1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 4UBP.DE | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.31 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 1.21 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.54 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4UBP.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum SGLP.L drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBP.DE and SGLP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4UBP.DE | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -37.06% | +21.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.21% | -17.24% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.60% | -17.24% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | -17.24% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -15.31% | +11.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -13.74% | +7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 6.62% | -5.66% |
Volatility
4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) is 1.09%, while Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that 4UBP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4UBP.DE | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 5.07% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 20.05% | -17.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 23.07% | -18.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 16.25% | -9.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 14.81% | -8.37% |
4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
4UBP.DE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
4UBP.DE vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4UBP.DE nor SGLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
4UBP.DE and SGLP.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for 4UBP.DE.
4UBP.DE is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while SGLP.L is Precious Metals. 4UBP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond, while SGLP.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for 4UBP.DE and 0.12% for SGLP.L.
Find the right allocation for 4UBP.DE and SGLP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer