4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE).
4UBP.DE and AW1C.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 4UBP.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. AW1C.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® ESG Elite. It was launched on Feb 18, 2021. Both 4UBP.DE and AW1C.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4UBP.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 0.37% | -2.18% | 6.73% | 5.80% | -13.17% | 6.82% |
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | -3.47% | 6.94% | 24.89% | 24.93% | -14.50% | 30.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4UBP.DE achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than AW1C.DE's -3.47% return.
4UBP.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- -1.40%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
4UBP.DE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
4UBP.DE
AW1C.DE
4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 4UBP.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | 0.35 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | 0.73 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.13 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.60 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 1.20 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 4UBP.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 0.35 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.63 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.66 | -0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between 4UBP.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4UBP.DE nor AW1C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4UBP.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum AW1C.DE drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBP.DE and AW1C.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4UBP.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -22.40% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | -16.86% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | -22.40% | +7.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -14.96% | +10.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -5.84% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 8.51% | -6.70% |
Volatility
4UBP.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) is 1.50%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that 4UBP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AW1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 4UBP.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 4.35% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.98% | 23.29% | -20.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.99% | 27.78% | -21.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.56% | 18.28% | -11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.50% | 18.21% | -11.71% |